Saturday, June 6, 2020

BRAHMS-THE BOY II: SEQUELITIS



When movies are successful enough they now generate sequels. With any luck they go even further and create a franchise, a series of movies made for cheap that generate tons of money for the film studios releasing them. This is great for fans of a movie and even better when the movie is a solid flick. But most second features in a series end up not quite as good as the original. Such is the case with BRAHMS: THE BOY II.
If you remember the first film it involved a young woman hired by an elderly couple to watch their son while they went on vacation. Except when she got there the little boy turned out to be a doll. Eventually we learned that there actually was a young boy who had been scarred during a fire now living in the walls wearing a porcelain mask. As the film ended we saw he survived a stabbing by our heroine and was repairing the doll she shattered.
The sequel kicks off with mother Liza (Katy Holmes) and her young son Jude (Christopher Convery) surviving a home invasion, leaving both of them traumatized with Jude now not speaking but writing anything he wants to say. Thinking a new setting will help they move to the Heelshires' property with husband/father Sean (Owain Yeoman). This is the property from the first film but not the main house, instead still on the grounds.
Once they move in strange things begin to happen. Jude finds Brahms, the doll, buried on the property. Taking him home and cleaning him up his attachment to Brahms deepens daily. He wants Brahms to eat with them, to be served a plate of food. Liz can hear voices coming from Jude’s room. Out of the corner of her eye she can see someone run by, thinking it is Jude, only to have Jude come up behind her. Is something actually taking place of is this Liz’ method of dealing with the trauma of the break in?
Also disturbing is the presence of a caretaker on the grounds named Joseph (Ralph Ineson). Walking the grounds with his shotgun, accompanied by his dog, Joseph talks of things from the past but seems to be hiding something. A shadowy figure, could he be behind some of the things taking place?
Eventually Jude finds the old mansion from the first film, guided there by “Brahms”. Liz finds him and takes him home but not before the feeling of something strange going on there. As things begin to escalate at home, the feeling of security the relocation was supposed to bring declines as does the thought that Brahms is a good way for Jude to communicate. Before decisions can be made by both parents, their options become limited. Is it Liz? Jude? Or is Brahms really making it happen?
The movie does a decent job of keeping the tension at peak level throughout. Knowing what we do of the first film we’re aware of the dangers that this family is facing. At least we think we do. But this becomes part of the issue, we already know that Brahms survived the first film. But do we? Or have they chosen a different path where Brahms is nowhere to be found and some new evil force is making things happen? Or was Brahms the doll really the cause of everything in both films? All of these options are on the table before finally being revealed.
I’ve always said the sign of a good actor is when you believe they are the character they are playing and don’t notice that this is acting. All three of the main actors here do a great job. Holmes has developed into an actress that deserves more and better roles. She’s convincing here as Liz and you are concerned for her and the safety of her family. Convery, for his young age and playing most of the film in silence, is perfect as the wide eyed innocent whose life is being taken over. And Yeoman shows again how good he is, something I thought back when he was featured in THE MENTALISTS TV series.
So does the film work as a sequel? Yes and no. It is a solid story, the performances are well done and it looks good. But it doesn’t have the same impact as the first film did and that film didn’t feel worthy of a sequel. Taken on its own the film might be better, without the baggage of the first film. If you go in that way the odds are you’ll enjoy this one better than someone who saw that film. It’s good for a night’s rental and entertainment but I don’t see this one moving forward into a complete franchise. Better to stop here. 

No comments:

Post a Comment