Thursday, January 21, 2016

TENDERNESS OF THE WOLVES: WW ERA SERIAL KILLER



One thing I try to strive for is to watch as many movies from as wide a variety of sources and styles as possible. In doing so I might not like all of them but at least I’ve left myself open to seeing things outside of my comfort zone and exposed myself to things I might miss that are great and some that are the worst things imaginable. As movie loves I think we all need to do this and then let others know what we think. The bad thing is that those that disagree, those that think we’re stupid for not “getting” what is great about a film or those that think we’re stupid for enjoying something they think of as drek feel the need to be upset with your feelings on something they love or hate. What they miss is the fact that the opportunity was there to see something that might not be available in the first place and that by being discussed is brought to the attention of many who might not know it even exists.

I’ve spoken often in my reviews of Arrow Video. I think they are among the top five companies right now (perhaps even higher) when it comes to releasing hard to find films, obscure films, classic films, art films and movies in general that are more likely than not to be passed over by the major studios. Not only do they do a fantastic job of this, they offer their titles in the best possible formats, include outstanding extras whenever possible and do so at a price that is reasonable (sorry Criterion, you charge far too much for what you deliver). I may not always love the movies they release but I do appreciate all of the efforts they go through to deliver to those that do.

With that in mind I just watched TENDERNESS OF THE WOLVES, a 1973 movie directed by UIli Lommell. Lommell was a protégé of Rainer Werner Fassbinder and a part of the New German Cinema movement that ran during the early 70s. His career has gone up and down and he’s delivered fairly mainstream films like THE BOOGEYMAN as well as several films that could be called “art films” before finally making his way to made for DVD movies that haven’t fared that well. But there is always the possibility of his rising once more.

TENDERNESS focuses on the true story of Fritz Haarmann, a German serial killer who did most of his nefarious deeds right after WWI. As played by Kurt Raab, Haarmann comes off as one of the most chilling murderers seen on screen. An uncloseted homosexual who preyed on young boys that he then murdered, Haarmann then went on to cut up his victims and sell their bodies as meat to friends who were in need of fresh meat. While that alone might make for a terrifying killer there is more behind the man to make him even more horrific.

Raab plays Haarmann as a slightly shy yet smooth talking con man who convinces friends to ignore his odd behavior from time to time. Not only does he get them to ignore it, he talks his way out of an arrest by offering his services to the local police in helping them ferret out other criminals. With a fake badge in pocket he uses his influence to not only pass along information about his criminal competition, he also uses it to persuade young runaway boys to his apartment where he beds and then kills them. Raab has chosen a bald headed look that at times reminds us of Max Schreck as Nosferatu, a good comparison as Haarmann was also known as the vampire of Hanover due to his biting some of his victims on the neck.

The movie takes on an odd feel for a number of reasons besides the pedophilic serial killer at the center of it all. The people Haarmann associates with may belong to the lower criminal class but they are also seen as struggling to survive after their country has been beaten in war. There is a certain amount of sympathy to be felt for them and Lommell depicts that in subtle ways. The movie also has a bombed out feel in it’s of settings and style of being filmed. The filmed world of Haarmann is a grey one lacking of color and life, much as that Germany would have been at the time. The few glimpses of color involve either his associations in a local bar or during the murder sequences.

The life and times of Haarmann are seen here in the latter part of his life rather than attempting to cover his entire career. In the end the number of murders he committed with his lover Hans Grans has been listed as anywhere between 24 and 50 people. That many are not seen here. He isn’t depicted as a raging lunatic but as I stated earlier, as a subtle and manipulative sort that isn’t seen killing in the most brutal fashion of some movie killers but still in perhaps some of the most twisted ways.

For a film coming out of the seventies it offers more full frontal nudity than most as well as touching on homosexuality that was still fairly taboo at the time. It doesn’t condone or condemn the topic but instead uses it to develop its central character. If you find this offensive then the movie will do just that. I mention it so that those who might be are aware.

In the end the movie is one I may have to watch a second time to fully understand or appreciate. While the story itself is interesting (enough so that another more famous movie, M, was based on this same tale), I found the pacing of the film to be slow and in trying to keep up with the translation of dialogue with what I was watching made me unable to fully appreciate what was on the screen at times. As a single viewing experience it was just so so for me. Perhaps my opinion will change the second time around. What I did find was an experience of watching a film from another country that didn’t fit the Hollywood mold. That doesn’t make it a good experience, just a different one.

For the average viewer I’m not sure I would suggest watching this. For foreign film fans you will love it. For fans of Lommell and Fassbinder I have little doubt you will add it to your collection. For me, on the whole, it was interesting but nothing stupendous.

As for how Arrow Video has treated this release they’ve outdone themselves once more. Extras include:
-A new high definition digital transfer prepared by the Rainer Werner Fassbinder Foundation
-New translated English subtitles
-THE TENDER WOLF – a new in depth interview with director Lommell
-A new interview with director of photography Jurgen Jurges
-A newly filmed appreciation of the film by film historian and expert on European horror cinema Stephen Thrower
-The theatrical trailer
-A reversible sleeve
-An illustrated booklet featuring new writings on the film by Tony Rayns

SCREAM AND SCREAM AGAIN: A DISAPPOINTMENT TO SAY THE LEAST



How could you go wrong with a horror film that proclaims Peter Cushing, Christopher Lee and Vincent Price all starring in the same film? Well the makers of this movie tried to do whatever they could wrong and have succeeded. A true disappointment for horror fans. I tried to like this one the first time I saw it and did again this time around. Both times left me wondering what they were thinking.

The plot put simply involves a serial killer who is draining the blood of his victims in London. The police track him down to the home of an eccentric scientists. From there more plotlines evolve including a top secret organization that plans on conquering the world with a superhuman race of beings they’ve created. Tossed in are sequences in some Eastern European fascists state and various governmental groups in England and you have a mish mash of storylines that makes the movie confusing at best and nonsensical at worst. The story is so convoluted that you wonder just who is with or against who from scene to scene.

Perhaps the most terrible thing about this movie is that the three icons of horror included here are so utterly wasted it makes it apparent their inclusion was done just to sell tickets. Cushing has what amounts to a cameo appearance as does Lee. Price, a great actor when given the part, hams it up with a role that gets enough to not qualify as a cameo but isn’t enough to get star billing either. The fact that they don’t perform together also doesn’t help this film.

I’ve been stunned to find reviews where people have actually said they liked this film. For the most part horror fans have had little good to say about it over the years and the odds are that isn’t likely to change with this version being made available.

Twilight Time has done their best to make this THE version you want to own but my suggestion would be that only fans invest the time and money for this one. While Twilight Time has done a great job on the extras I found them to be more interesting than the movie itself. Included are:
-An Isolated Score Track
-Audio Commentary with Film Historians David Del Valle and Tim Sullivan
-Gentleman Gothic: Gordon Hessler at AIP
-An Interview with Uta Levka
-A Still Gallery
-Radio Spots
-The Original Theatrical Trailer

Click here to order.

THUNDERCRACK!: WHAT THE…



To say you’ve never seen anything like this movie is an understatement. Truly, there has never been a movie made prior to this one like it and even following it’s “creation” nothing compares. Whether you consider it art, exploitation or just plain crap will depend on your point of view. I was stunned by the number of favorable reviews to be found on imdb.com for this movie, so much that I had to assume they were either written by cast or production members or those that find things like elephant feces tossed on a canvas to be art. That being said I think you can tell where my mind is when talking about this movie. If you loved it I’m glad that you enjoyed it. I think that the majority of people will be like myself, unaware of what exactly they’re getting into and wondering why they bought or rented this disc.

The story, as much of one that there is, involves the stereotypical old dark house theme. Well at least to begin with. Various drivers find themselves stranded during a storm with only one nearby house to go to that’s supposed to be a mansion. The hand drawn graphics used show a mansion, the interior screams someone’s house that could be used for this movie. The owner of the house is weird to say the least. While some who’ve reviewed her performance as Shakespearean it felt more like it like someone trying out for a junior high school play who was turned down. This character talks about her late husband, killed by locust and whose body parts she retains pickled in various jars around the house.

As the film progresses she tells her “guests” that they can change into dry clothes she has in the house in a different room. While they change she watches through a hole in the wall masturbating with a shaved cucumber the whole time. I told you this was weird. And this is where the movie changes from old dark house to possible art film to straight out porn. Each of the “guests” who enters becomes involved in various sex acts: masturbation, girl on girl, guy on girl, guy on guy, guy on blow up doll. Those are the few I can remember. I’ve tried to block out most of this film and have been for the most part fairly successful.

Shot in black and white, my guess is to make it qualify for “art” status, the movie is filled with poorly shot, poorly lit and poorly acted segments. If there was directing involved I’m not sure what it was. The script jumps from one thing to the next and is filled with various diatribes about things hard to decipher or that you won’t want to decipher. For instance a guy in love with a gorilla, played by someone in what is perhaps the worst gorilla suit of all time. Think back to any gorilla seen on a show like GILLIGAN’S ISLAND. THAT gorilla looked real compared to this one.

If porn offends you, you will be offended by this film. If “art” films are not your thing, you will want to ignore this one. If you want to watch this movie for “film history’s sake” then feel free; if you like that sort of thing you’ll be thrilled. For myself I don’t find much artistic in films like this. It becomes a jumble of ideas, concepts, weird acting/directing/photographing and off the cuff items that it doesn’t hold my interest for longer than a few minutes at best. I’m admitting that I’m more inclined to watch mainstream movies and favor those. But if this is your kind of thing then enjoy yourself while I watch something I consider more entertaining.

Click here to order.